Says mailers are half-truths, supports Meyer

To the editor:

I used to think that voting against “politics as usual” meant voting against the incumbent. Nothing could be further from the truth when it comes to the House District 9 election if, like me, you define “politics as usual” as dishonest and negative campaign tactics like we have seen from Ann Meyer’s opponent.

To that point, I would like to address one of the more egregious claims I have seen on mailers and advertising that says that Ann voted against coverage for pre-existing conditions. What Ann voted against was a secondary amendment that required an up or down vote without modification. While one part of that amendment included pre-existing condition protections, it was mostly full of partisan fluff and as such it was doomed to fail. Suggesting that Ann voted against coverage for pre-existing conditions based on her vote against that amendment is the equivalent of saying you don’t like chocolate because you won’t eat a pound of dog excrement even though I mixed in a few chocolate chips.

So why would members of either party put forward an amendment with no chance of it passing? So they can plaster half-truth claims on mailers and TV ads. Ann’s opponent has said on multiple occasions that he is not a politician… it sure doesn’t look that way.

I will be voting for Ann Meyer because she has done a great job in her first term in the Iowa House. I will also be voting against “politics as usual” and encourage you to do the same by joining me in supporting Ann Meyer.

Matt Wagner

Fort Dodge


Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)

Starting at $4.75/week.

Subscribe Today