Voter ID decision makes sense

U.S. Supreme Court justices have taken a far-reaching, important stance in regard to fair, honest elections. While their ruling was on a narrow issue, it appears to signal a belief in the idea that some limits on voting are important and desirable.

In a 6-3 ruling, the court upheld an Indiana law that voters can be asked to produce photo-identification documents at polling places. The law is intended to prevent fraudulent voting.

Opponents had argued that it unfairly restricts the ability of some voters, who may not have photo-identification documents, to take part in elections.

But the majority on the court concluded that the requirement is not “excessively burdensome” — and added that similar rules are important to ensure that elections are conducted honesty.

We agree. Allowing anyone who wishes to vote to do so, as some have suggested, in effect, should be done, is an invitation to vote fraud. Rules such as those adopted in Indiana are important and necessary safeguards.

Voting indeed is a right for American citzens — but it carries responsibilities with it.

Voters who want elections to be conducted honestly should be pleased by the court’s ruling.